Aerial and satellite imagery
Used to review visible property, roof, site, access, and surrounding conditions when suitable imagery is available.
How the research works
Arden Meridian combines automation, geospatial information, public records, and analyst review to reduce manual property research without presenting the result as certainty.
Start with the commercial question
Before screening begins, we define your geography, use case, target property profile, constraints, and intended next action.
The exact sources and review rules vary by territory because imagery quality, public records, local systems, and your requirements are not the same in every market.
Information the report may use
A report may use some or all of these categories. We assess availability, permitted use, age, and reliability for each project.
Used to review visible property, roof, site, access, and surrounding conditions when suitable imagery is available.
May include parcel boundaries, ownership-related context, property attributes, permits, zoning, or other local records when available and permitted.
May include location, terrain, hazard exposure, surrounding land use, transportation, utilities, or other spatial information relevant to your goal.
Your priorities, operating limits, target property types, constraints, and our structured observations shape the final order and explanation.
Review process
Automation reduces repetitive work. Analyst review keeps the result understandable and tied to your goal.
We begin with your territory or portfolio, target property types, commercial decision, and the action the report should support.
We identify suitable imagery, parcel information, public records, infrastructure and environmental layers, and criteria provided by your team.
Properties are filtered and prioritized against the agreed goal using repeatable criteria and documented reasoning.
We check whether the evidence supports each priority and whether the important limitations are clear.
The final report explains why each property matters and what your team should verify through outreach, records, professional diligence, engineering, or site inspection.
How to read the priorities
Priority order, bands, or any project-specific scoring compare properties against documented rules for the agreed report. They are not engineering conclusions, appraisals, underwriting or credit decisions, utility-capacity confirmations, or guarantees of demand, risk, approval, or project success.
A solar prospect, maintenance candidate, resilience priority, and industrial site may use different evidence and review rules.
Missing, outdated, obscured, or inconsistent information can lower confidence in a finding.
The report should make outreach, records checks, professional review, engineering, or site inspection more focused, not eliminate them.
The available sources and the right workflow depend on your geography and goal. Share the decision you are evaluating and we can explain what a responsible free preview would include.
Request a free preview